Spring Vineyard Ride 2011

This past month, I photographed the 2011 Spring Vineyard Ride, hosted by Nassau Suffolk Horsemen’s Association and Old Field Farm, Ltd. It was my first ever on-my-own gig! For those of you that attended the Spring Vineyard Ride, please e-mail me for a link to the rest of the pictures from that day. My e-mail is jennifer.voce@gmail.com. Everyone else, I’m sorry to say that I won’t be sharing all of my photographs here, just a select few.

I actually learned about the Spring Vineyard Ride through a co-worker of mine, Denise Speizio. She happened to be the president of the NSHA and was talking with me about the different events she was helping to organize for the 2011 year. When I heard there was a Vineyard Ride planned for June, I asked her if I could come photograph the event. She was absolutely delighted, and so was I! It was honestly the opportunity I’d been searching for. Not only that, but she suggested I use the Annual Swap Night to get a head-start on exhibiting my work. I had edited a picture a while back using Photoshop CS4 of a saddle on a white picket fence with rows of grape vines behind it. I framed it and placed that item in the Silent Auction, the first piece I’ve ever made available to the public!

On to the main event! I couldn’t have asked for better weather: warm and sunny with a nice breeze. I arrived at Martha Clara, the start and end point of the wine tour, an hour before the event was to begin. I checked in with Denise, picked up a map of the trail route, and started photographing right away. After working at Explo and for Lifetouch’s Sports and Events department, I learned that every aspect of an event is important and should therefore be documented. There were four wineries on the tour: Martha Clara Vineyards, Paumanok Vineyards, Jamesport Vineyards, and brand new to the trail, the Diliberto Winery. I managed to photograph the groups at all but Jamesport. I couldn’t follow the groups on horseback (no horse), so I settled for my car. I probably could have photographed at all four if I had planned my own route better, but you do what you can your first time out. Whenever someone asked how they’d be able to find my pictures later on, I handed them my business card (made at Vistaprint.com. FREE!) which has my name, what I photograph, my phone number, e-mail, and blog.

Editing was easy in comparison to a few other bumps I encountered on this enlightening journey:

  • watermarking my photographs
  • debating what platform to post the photographs
  • deciding how to price my product, how to receive payment, and ultimately how to send the photographs

I debated how I would watermark my photographs. There are a few different watermarking programs you can download from the internet. Most of them are free trials with the option of purchasing. The ones I ran across were:

I used Mark It Now Pro 2.1 because it had a ten-day trial and was easily uploaded from cnet.com. My biggest complaint with the trial was you couldn’t re-size the window to be able to read all of the text boxes and options available for placing your watermark. Other than that, it was user friendly and even had a manual you could read through if you had any questions about the program. You could create one watermark you liked and transpose it onto as many photographs as you wanted, and even save the settings for that watermark rather than figuring it out again. There were two types of watermark: text and picture. I chose text, that way I could write my blog name all over the photograph. A picture watermark would be good for a company with a logo.

I finally chose to place my photographs on Picasa, a Google-based photo sharing network. Since I already use Picasa as my primary editing software and have a Google e-mail account, it was really easy to do. What really helped me to choose Picasa was its ability to make my photo albums private unless I invite someone to view that photo album. I didn’t think it would be fair to post these photographs from this event online for just anyone to see. Similarly, when I post Ultimate photographs on Facebook of myself and my friends, you can only view them if you’re a friend of mine or a friend of a friend.

How to print and where… It turns out those questions weren’t very simple to answer. I turned to the internet and found a forum to help. It turns out there are two types of printers available: inkjet and dye-sublimation. Inkjet printers make up solid colors using tiny dots of individual colors, sort of like A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte. These dots can be visible if you hold the picture close to your face. One post on the forum described dye-sublimation very well:

Dye-sublimation printers actually print gradients (shades) of colour and layer it on top. If you want something in shades of red on an inkjet, [its] solid red dots combined with the white of the paper underneath to give the illusion of shades of red. A dye-sub actually prints different levels of pure colour.

To make purple on an inkjet, [there are] lots of solid red and solid blue dots to give the impression of purple at an appropriate viewing distance. On a dye-sub, it actually puts red on the paper, then puts blue right on top of it, so you actually get a true purple colour. No matter how close you get to it, no dots.

The post went on to say that Walgreens actually prints with dye-sublimation printers. I’ve never known what it was about the printers about Walgreens that made them better (I’ve tried CVS and Target and found I don’t like their prints as much). I felt rather enlightened. So when the time comes, I’ll be making sure the printer I use is a dye-sublimation rather than an inkjet.

Pricing the products were difficult, mostly because I’ve never had to make my own prices before. It’s been said you need to take into account a few things: traveling to the site, use of your equipment, time spent editing, time and resources put into the printing process, and how you’re shipping the packages. I tried to make my prices as reasonable as possible based on a website I had seen of similar nature, and made the products pretty basic (4×6, 5×7, 8×10, and “negatives”). One thing I had considered putting together was a photo book, but with over 150 photographs one book was $80+ to create. That would make it next to ridiculously priced by me, so I scrapped the idea.

My original idea for sending the products and receiving payment went from going through an online website and PayPal to the old fashioned way: e-mail me your order, mail me a check, I’ll mail you the pictures. The reasons I didn’t set up the online printer website were I wouldn’t be able to see the prints first, and the prices. I want to make sure the photographs that are ordered are 100% approved by me. If the print doesn’t come out to my standards (improperly cropped, not a large enough file for that particular size sheet, grainy looking photograph, etc.), I want to be able to fix it. The prices ranged from $100 a year to $360 a year just to sell your photographs online, something I really can’t afford at this time. PayPal wanted a cut of the money I’d be making, which is perfectly reasonable considering they are offering a service but once again it’s not something I can really do (plus keeping my bank account information stored on any network makes me nervous).

So there you have it! The behind the scenes of my first ever photo shoot. And here you thought all I did was take amazing pictures 😉 Enjoy!

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

I Scream, You Scream, We All Scream for iMac

For those of you who don’t know, I’ve been using the same laptop for over seven years now. We met on my first day of college and she’s been everywhere with me, including Australia, upstate New York, Explo, and the smaller journeys in between. The good thing about this is despite the mileage (both literal and figurative), it still works well. The bad thing about this is that I can’t upload new, great programs like Photoshop CS5 (or CS for that matter, I tried) because it will most likely give my laptop the equivalent of a stroke. What’s a budding digital photographer to do?

While working at Explo I had constant access to a 27″ iMac. “Drool” is one word that comes to mind when describing this piece of machinery. The other word that comes to mind is “broke”, which is something I could have been if I bought this $2,000 computer. I’ve also been bitten by the Photoshop bug, which was bound to happen (read All I Want for Christmas is Photoshop in case you missed that story). I debated my options for the past few months, Mac or PC, desktop or laptop, over and over again. I was beginning to sound like a broken record and was no closer to making a decision. I had heard that Macs are better with photo editing because of their screen’s ability to be more closely aligned to the colors of a printer, but I also listened to my bank account and was wondering for a bit if I should just buy a PC as it’s cheaper.

Fortunately for me, I’ve made the greatest discovery since fire: the Refurbished department in the Apple Store. Ok, I’m being a little dramatic, but my tax return wasn’t exactly what I hoped for. By purchasing the refurbished version of the iMac, I saved $300+ dollars which means I’ll be using that extra money to buy Photoshop, or Microsoft Office 2011 for Mac or Apple’s equivalent, iWork. Both have decent reviews, although it sounds like Microsoft Office 2011 isn’t all that’s cracked up to be. Many reviews complained of bugs galore, like poor running time, frozen programs, and lost data. But I’m not here to talk about word document programs…

The computer I went with was the iMac 27-inch 2.8GHz Intel Quad-Core i5 processor. If you’re looking at what I just typed and are completely lost, have no fear. I did a bit of research:

  • 27-inch = the size of the screen (obvious yes, but I’m all about transparency)
  • 2.8 GHz  refers to the speed at which the processor does its job. The more gigahertz, the faster things are processed on your computer. Great for multi-taskers.
  • On quad-core and more, take a look at this article. It speaks well to the average Joe about what makes the difference in your computer, and for Photoshop users, “… less than 1% of all popular software applications [can] handle the second core. The ones that could, like Adobe Photoshop, would absolutely fly! On a 3 GHz per side dual core, Photoshop performs like it was accessing a 6 GHz single core or even better than that!” A.k.a., good 🙂

There is no tower with the iMac, which makes it more compact (laptop-esque), and the keyboard and mouse are wireless, making it an overall clean and compact set-up. As “cool” as wireless is, I think it’s a waste of money and resources buying batteries. Luckily the Apple Store was flexible with me and allowed me to trade my wireless keyboard and Magic Mouse for the Apple Keyboard with the Numeric Keys and the Apple Mouse. I don’t even have to use two USB outlets on the back of the iMac as the keyboard itself houses two more USB ports. Now THAT’S cool.

Two things popped up during my switch from PC to Mac. At the moment, I am Photoshop-less, and was looking forward to becoming acquainted with iPhoto. If you’re like me, you have a system for organizing and saving all of your files. iPhoto really isn’t ok with that. It will let you upload and bring pictures into its library, but if you start messing with the library (for example, naming a folder “02 Dad’s Birthday” rather than “983239543”), it suddenly doesn’t know where the pictures are and cannot access the folder. I like my method of organizing (by year, then season, then event in chronological order), and like being able to easily find and access the folder of photographs I’m creating, which was really hard to do with all the photos tucked away in the iPhoto Library. The iPhoto Library’s storage method is awful; it takes all of your photos and puts them in the same folder, making them hard to find. Really, really hard to find. Therefore, I uploaded Picasa for Mac. Rather than me dragging photographs into the program’s special library folder, it searches your computer for the files. That means I can keep everything nice and neat the way I like to be able to access it.

My second Mac roadblock came with my external hard drive. I own a Seagate 250 GB Portable External Drive. I love it. It’s been really helpful in allowing me to keep my computer relatively free of unnecessary clutter, like seven years of digital photographs, without losing anything. Switching from PC to Mac isn’t so easy for my little friend. I found out I can’t save to it from my Mac without first reformatting it. Unfortunately, reformatting means EVERYTHING on it will be deleted. Yes, I can probably move everything over to my Mac, format the Seagate, and move it back once I’ve finished, but my number one fear of that is JPEGs and their ability to become of poorer and poorer quality every time you make a copy of it. I’m debating purchasing a new hard drive rather than reformatting the old one so as to not lose the current quality my photographs have.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Flashes of Happiness

Over a month ago, two of my very good friends were married at the Swan Club. After the wedding I’d attended the month before (see So Happy Together), I was excited about applying the knowledge I’d gained from my last wedding to this one. There were a few differences between the two weddings, but I found what was most difficult for me was the lighting. The flash I use is the internal one on my camera, which is fine if you’re close. Put the subject at the end of a long room and forget about it. Luckily, the photographers and I seemed to have similar timing for picture taking and I have quite a few photos that caught their light source, saving my photos. The photos without this light source are absolutely riddled with noise. It’s just another reason why I’m looking at purchasing a Nikon Speedlight (see The Hat’s Where It’s At).

It’s taken me a while to edit the photos because I accidentally took them all in RAW. There’s nothing wrong with RAW. In fact, it’s the closest thing to a negative that digital has to offer. What’s difficult about it in my case is I’ve yet to purchase an editing software that supports the changes I can make with it — ridding my photos of the exorbitant amount of noise, and bringing up the brightness and color without washing out the photo. Why? Because it’s crazy expensive. Fortunately for me, I now have access to Photoshop CS4 which I’ve been reading up on so that I can improve the photos in this post. Reading Photoshop CS4 for Dummies is taking a lot longer than I expected though. Rather than keep these photos from the world any longer (or mostly just the bride and groom), I thought I’d put them up now. The edited shots will come, but for now, enjoy!

The biggest difference between a RAW file and a JPEG file is the following very pertinent information. Every time you save a JPEG file, it condenses itself, which eventually distorts and damages the image, whether you’re copy-pasting or editing and saving. RAW is considered “lossless”, as the information that was originally there stays that way. The file never tries to downsize itself, so time or editing or saving cannot harm it. The editing software I own is Picasa, which is free and easy to learn for JPEG but less than useful for RAW, especially when Picasa tries to save your RAW photo changes at JPEGs. Either way, it is a good idea to make a duplicate of your files before you begin editing.